The Union government has informed the Supreme Court that it intends to cancel the scorecards of candidates who were awarded grace marks. This decision is part of efforts to address concerns over the fairness and integrity of the examination process for NEET-UG 2024. Meanwhile, the National Testing Agency (NTA) has responded by conducting internal reviews and implementing measures to ensure transparency and maintain the credibility of the exams.
Of the 1,563 candidates affected, those who wish to improve their scores will be allowed to take the test again on June 23. The results will be declared by June 30, allowing the counselling process to begin by July 6. Candidates who choose not to take the re-test will retain their original scores, minus the compensatory marks.
What happened?
The court heard petitions challenging the award of grace marks to 1,563 candidates from six NEET centres, who faced technical issues and couldn’t use the full 3.2 hours. A committee from the National Testing Agency (NTA) recommended these compensatory marks based on a court order. The grant of these marks was criticized as arbitrary and non-transparent.
What are charges against NEET 2024?
In NEET, students have to answer 180 questions, (MCQ type), totalling 720 marks. For every right answer, the student will score four marks, with one mark deducted for a wrong answer. Hence, only certain marks can be scored by candidates. It was the grace marks that caused confusion, the NTA admitted.
However, this is not the only charge or case in court against NEET 2024. This year there has been a litany of charges that go beyond a question paper leak, including the slow distribution of question papers; providing the wrong question paper; wrong OMR sheets; and technical delays.
In the past, the exam has been dogged by charges of poor organisation and inadequate planning, besides inconsiderate rules on what candidates are allowed to wear to the exam hall.
All these charges sparked protests from students and political parties across the country. Political parties called for a fair investigation of the charges and called on the government to conduct a fresh NEET exam. Students had the same demand, to re-conduct the test, on the grounds that the question paper leak had facilitated some students scoring full marks, or, giving them an unfair advantage. Experts and students pointed to how the very idea of starting NEET as a common entrance exam to regulate medical admissions in the country and ensure quality-control of the process would be defeated in the light of all the reported violations.
In response, the NTA had appointed a four-member committee to go into allegations made against the conduct of the NEET exam in 2024. This panel’s recommendations have now found their way into the court also.
What was the NTA’s response?
NTA officials attributed an ‘easy paper’ to the unusual number of full scores this year. But the NTA still constituted a four-member committee to go into the truth behind the allegations made this year. The panel found that the compensatory marks awarded to the 1,563 students, resulted in a “skewed situation”. Grace marks had to be limited to the attempted questions alone, and while the panel did not comment further on how many marks were granted in compensation, it concluded that it would be best to cancel the test for these students alone.
What next?
Students and education experts have already expressed dissatisfaction with the cancellation of the exam only for a few students. Arguing that if the exam can be cancelled for 1,500 students, then that is an admission of error and therefore, they claim that the logical thing would be to cancel the May 5 exam for all candidates and conduct a re-test. It indicates a failure of the system and loss of faith, students complained on social media.
Instead of rendering the pitch even, as a measure of ensuring the quality of candidates entering the medical profession, the way NEET is being conducted has created several additional layers of privilege. For an exam of its size and scale, where over 23 lakh students take the test in about 4,500 centres across the country, in multiple languages, small issues may crop up.
However, the test has been around for nearly a decade, and it is reasonable to assume that its teething troubles are over. Preventing fraud and application of mind (on the part of the invigilators to give extra time to students who did not have adequate time) should be eminently possible, certainly by the government agencies.